|

| |
Please choose a
review or scroll to view all:
The Visit
Separate Tables Coda4Makbet
After The Dance
FlexFX
After the Dance Naina
Provoked
K3G
“The Visit”
|
|
“The Visit” was a huge hit when it first opened in
Switzerland and the latest adaptation brought to stage at The Questors
Theatre in West London, is not far off. The story begins with a grief
s tricken “Gullen Town” that has no money and poverty is very high, so all
the town people can only seem doom and gloom with no prospects of the
future –except one. Claire Zacchanassian a one time resident of the town
of Gullen is returning after 20 years with the idea of regenerating the
town, and of course she can, because she is returning a billionaire.
The
town are aware that she is the only hope and do all they can to get her to
give the final yes to make the town prosperous again, including taking
note of her ex love Anton Schill. Though this sounds like an easy task,
it begins a chain of events that unfolds why Claire has returned, what her
association with the town is and the lengths the town will go to get them
prosperous and wealthy again.
What is great about “The Visit” is the level of stylisation
that has been reached by the cast. As an ensemble they excel, and you can
really feel that their circumstances are dictating their actions.
Director Mark Fitzgerald has managed to gain some great performances. Of
the main characters, Rahul Nath excels as the Burgomaster. It is great to
see an actor that is so committed and is the character, that you actually
do not recognise him. It has been rumoured that he has spent three months
rehearsing with a pillow attached to his stomach to get the feel of how
the Burgomaster walks and moves, and it has been well worth it His
confrontation scene with Anton is one to watch, it is here that you sense
the extraordinary ability of this actor and how he carries the twist of
the play. His comical timing is excellent and he comes out top in his
“typewriter” scene
Alex Mcdevitt does great justice as Claire. You feel her
pain and understand why she carries out her actions. Visually she looks
beautiful and has great body language throughout her scenes. Her
unintentional comical timing is superb in her scenes with Pedro and she
has great chemistry with Bobby. Her scenes with Bobby provide a real look
into her character.
Stephen Kavanagh is well suited to Anton. He displays a
range of mixed emotions. You sense his anger and frustration towards his
town members as the play progresses and he does a good job of keeping his
characters pride and dignity.
Of the supporting cast, Steve Tilliet, Nigel Weaver and
Rahul Kohli do great justice in their strong and pivotal roles.
Overall make sure you visit “The Visit”, it is a play that
will keep you entertained and provide great humour and sadness all in one
visit!!
The Visit opens on 24th March 2007 at The
Questors Theatre
By Katy Gallantry |
back to top |
|
“Separate Tables”
It's the off-season at the lonely Beauregard Hotel in
Bournemouth, and only the long-term tenants
are still in residence. Life
at the Beauregard is stirred up, however, when the beautiful Ann Shankland
arrives to see her alcoholic ex-husband, John Malcolm, who is secretly
engaged to Pat Cooper, the woman who runs the hotel. Meanwhile, snobbish
Mrs Railton-Bell discovers that the kindly if rather doddering Major
Pollock is not what he appears to be. The news is particularly shocking
for her frail daughter, Sibyl, who is secretly in love with the Major.
This newly revived stage production of Terence Rattigan's
1955 West End hit features a stellar ensemble cast. The play follows the
interplay of a group of lonely characters who are staying at a slightly
shabby seaside hotel in Bournemouth. The term "separate tables" refers to
the practice of seating single guests at their own tables in the dining
room, and serves as a metaphor for the characters' fear of intimacy. Major
Pollack (Rahul Nath) is a retired officer who likes to wax eloquent about
fanciful acts of heroism in WWII North Africa, and Sybil Railton-Bell
(Danielle Moran) is a repressed spinster boxed in by an oppressive mother.
John Malcolm, a cynical, hard-drinking, occasional writer, is surprised by
the sudden arrival of his ex-wife Ann (Amy Bragwyn). Though Ann's
legendary beauty is dimmed by age, Ann and John both reach tentatively for
some human contact. SEPARATE TABLES, a work that now seems relatively
tame, was controversial in its day for attempting to deal with sexual
problems, however obliquely.
The all-star cast is excellent, but it is the genius of
Hannah Whiteoak who plays Pat Cooper, that steals the show. She is
sensitive, grounded and has excellent stage presence. This actress surely
has a great future ahead of her and slips into this role, like a glove on
a hand. Rahul Nath proves he is capable of
more serious roles instead of sticking to mostly comedies. His character
transition is great and he has a perfect knack for portraying the
subtleties of his relationship with Sybil. Moran and Nath have great
unsaid chemistry and you feel the care and love that both characters are
displaying.
Chris Amah and Neil Gittoes are great as their
roles as Charles and Mr. Fowler respectively. Gittoes provides
entertainment throughout both acts in a very dry sense of humour.
Amah deserves recognition for his calm and collected portrayal.
Bragwyn looks beautiful and speaks with a sweet soft tone, whilst
displaying the underlying selfish trait her character has.
A fine cast ensures this play delivers a
strong and enduring example of dramatic human behaviour and manages to
take you back to the difficulties of sexual issues in its era.
By Fran Hortop
back to top |
|
“Coda4Makbet”
TheatreStorm are known for their strange concepts and even
stranger character portrayals, so it comes as no surprise that Coda4Makbet
has this and much more.
The story begins in a dated house, where once upon a time
budding actors were given hopes and dreams of making it big in the film
industry. And enter two such candidates, Kristian (Thomas) and Kimiyia (Azizi).
But little
do they know that their future is very much determined once
they have stepped inside. They encounter the habits and mannerisms of each
of their housemates, though it seems a bit odd at first, as days pass what
seemed odd now seems to feel normal, what appeared strange
now looks like
everything else. The ability to think has reduced and it constantly feels
like a dream and there is a great need to sleep all the time. And why is
everything in the house, from the names of the housemates, to the cereal
box start with the letter K?
The question, is this really what the film industry is
about?
John Wilson has created an environment that is so
uncomfortable that it is better to expect the hairs on your body to stand
up. Kornelius (Wilson himself) is the leader of the pack and controls and
dictates what is being done and said. His brother Konstantine (Rawkins)
has a tendency to let the new guests know what they are in for, so he is
kept under control by the beautiful and elegant ladies, Katarina, (Camdzic)
Karmela, (Slawinska) Kassandra (Boulhaya) and Katja. (Urbanoowicz) The
second in command and also dictating the house is Kritikus (Lawrence) who
works closely with Kornelius to make sure their guests are “comfortable”.
The relatively sane one if you can call it that is Kyros, (Papafillippou)
but when he is watched alone on stage, you probably will not agree. Once
Kristian and Kimiya have adjusted, there are new guests to welcome. Keith
(Nath) and Kordelia (Higgins) stroll in all excited and happy, but this
slowly is washed away, as their reception have very little to say.
This is a fantastic play, not only for the completely off
tangent concept, but also it has characters from all over the world. It
is great in scene to scene to see all characters speak in their native
languages, and still convey the message of what is being said. Though the
script is mainly in English, there are snippets in regional languages that
add that extra flavor to the play.
Of the cast, no one performance can be faulted. Director
Wilson has done justice to give each character equal weight. Wilson
himself has strong body language throughout, and gives you the sense of
evil that is lurking. Thomas and Azizi give a good sense of what they are
going through. Thomas excels in his breakdown scene and Azizi is
completely there throughout the play. She looks stunning and gorgeous at
all times.
Rawkins manages to lighten the mood on each entry, while
Lawrence darkens it, with his wit and sarcasm.
The four beautiful ladies are all powerful in each role and
all are like goddesses. Slawinska, the one with the most venom is great
in her rage mode, while Boulhaya, Camdzic and Urbanoowicz are at their
best with their characters temperaments.
Papafillppou adds normality to his role, but makes the
transition very well to his other housemates.
Nath is completely at ease with his comical timing, and
proves why is constantly selected for these roles. He is great on his
entry and gets the laughter’s at the right marks. Higgins does well at
her small, but pivotal role.
An excellent cast and a superb direction ensures that
Coda4Makbet keeps you entertained from start to finish for the right
reasons. It takes you to a place that you may not want to go to, but
fortunately you will!!
By
Michelle McNally
back to top |
|
“After
the Dance”
WELL MADE
I have to confess to being a huge fan of Terence Rattigan. For many years
that was a deeply uncool thing to admit; certainly in the 60s and 70s when
Rattigan was at his most unfashionable: his plays were seen as horribly
snobbish, old fashioned and patronising. Worst of all they were said to be
“well made”
A
FRESH VIEW
Perhaps it is because Rattigan’s world is no longer our world. We do not
have butlers and servants, and the class wars fought by the Angry Young
Men of the Royal Court in the 50s and 60s. Instead, we can look back on
Rattigan’s plays with fresh eyes, and find, astonishingly, that they can
still move us as they moved our parents and grandparents.
NAKED EMOTION
What I love about Rattigan is that for someone whose characters are so
apparently reserved and conventional, he is amazingly unafraid to show his
emotions. I can think of no other writer — certainly no other English
writer — who is prepared to display emotion so nakedly on the stage.
RATTIGAN REVIVED
One by one, Rattigan’s plays have been revived, and critics who expected
to hate them have found themselves astonished by their continuing power.
After the Dance
is a play which is long overdue for a major revival. It was Rattigan’s
second play and was premiered in London in 1939.
ROMANTIC DRAMA
Instead of farce, he produced a full-blown romantic drama which, whilst
containing elements of the high comedy of his previous play, spirals
inevitably towards a tragic conclusion. The play is set in the Mayfair
flat of David Scott-Fowler (an echo of Scott Fitzgerald), a once
successful historian who is wasting his life on booze and partying. He is
torn between an earnest-minded young woman who tries to reform him and
make him face up to the fact that he is literally drinking himself to
death, and his wife of fourteen years who has lived the life of drinking
and partying with him.
THE CAST
Hovatter plays David and has portrayed him as a fragile gentlemen
searching for purpose and use. His stance and delivery make him
perfect for the role. Jeffers performance as the witty sophisticated
Joan is great. When she
breaks down it is all the more startling as she has been so successful at
hiding her feelings. Simon Roberts as John is excellent, especially
in conveying, at first, an apparent indifference to everything but his own
comfort, but then, unexpectedly, his sympathy for Joan and his
understanding of her. Kate Langston as Helen makes a good
transformation of the femme fatale, from innocent to brutally honest in
what she wants and her motivation to redeem and rescue David.
Kerri Logan overplays
her character as much as needed and does a good job of providing the
humour in all her scenes. Iain Stirling is well portrayed as the
struggling lover, trying to make a go of his life.
Of the supporting cast,
Rahul Nath grabs your attention as the Butler. He is respectful,
witty and charming all in one breath. You can see the obligation he
has at all times of his entry.
Ian Buckingham and Nina
Lubicz- Nawrocka provide great entertainment in their passionate kiss in
the party scene. The party scene itself is handled very well.
Gareth Bevan and Mary Davies shine in this scene. With the former
being completely drunk and the latter expressing her sexual
preferences. The combination of all of this makes the party scene
the highlight of the play .
Strong performances and
good casting all around.
This is a rare chance to
see a remarkable play. Don’t miss it.
By Marcus Reddington
back to top |
|
“FlexFX”

FlexFX have managed to carve a great name for themselves in
a short period of time and the annual British Asian Dhamaka is a
testimonial at how great they really are. It is a pleasure to see a show
that has no annoying hosts or gimmicky comics to take you from one act to
the next. Instead you have a natural flow of a cocktail of elaborate
dances, comedy sketches, and tasteful catwalks displaying big British
Indian talent in all areas
Artistic director Naz Chowdhury manages to keep the pace
alive from the very start. He has taken a very basic idea and thrown it
on to a huge canvas. Performance wise he has a great stage presence and
moves his body similar, if not better than Hrithik Roshan. His co
troupers are also on par and especially in the “Dum” number; you are left
gasping for more.
The selected music is a mixture of Bollywood hits, Arabic
and Bangla tunes, and though this may sound to grating to the ear the
result is one that is sweet as melody.
TV anchor Krishna Patel teams up with Imadhur Rahman and
TV/Film actor Rahul Nath to provide the acting segment of the show. She
herself looks graceful and at ease, but it is the combination of Rahman
and Nath that steal the show. Rahman is so at home with his character and
Nath provides excellent comical timing.
Singing sensation Raghav closes the show with his two
latest hits “It Cant Be Right” and “Can’t Get Enough” again accompanied by
the highly skilled dancers seen previously in the show
FlexFX latest offering confirms their slogan, “best in
British Asian entertainment” and this one is definitely worth a dekho!
By Nitika Gosswamy
back to top |
|
FILM
REVIEWS
“NAINA”
Producer:
Ram Gopal Varma
Director: Shripal Morakhia
Starring: Urmila Matondkar, Shweta Konnur, Anuj Sawheny, Kamini
Khanna, Amardeep Jha, Dinesh Lamba and Sulbha Arya
Music: No Musical Soundtrack
Lyrics: --
Genre:
Horror Thriller
Recommended Audience: Parental Guidance
Released on:
May 20, 2005
For those of you who
are still curious about this film (and you should be), it is a mix of ´The
Sixth Sense´ and the Korean hit ´The Eye´. Don´t let that turn you off
though, because the story is original, it´s just the paranormal ideas that
bare resemblance to the aforementioned films.
The
year is 1986. In England a young girl, on a trip with her parents, is
involved in an accident that leaves her orphaned and blind. At the same
time in Bhuj, Gujarat a lady gives birth to a still born fetus during a
lunar eclipse. By some miracle the baby opens its eyes and lives. How
these two events are linked comes about 20 years later. Naina (Urmila
Matondkar) is no longer the little blind orphan, she is getting a cornea
transplant to regain her vision. However her new eyes hold a terrible
secret and have a difficult past, making this transplant a journey into
hell for our Heroine. When Naina begins to see the future and a multitude
of dead bodies, she has two choices. Either sit there and go crazy or try
to find out what her eyes are trying to tell her.
First
time director Shripal Morakhia (who also co-wrote the screenplay with
Sagar Pandey) makes a decent first show with Naina. Anyone who wants to
compare it with ´The Eye´ is best advised not to do so. Naina is not as
polished
or psychologically creepy like its original. Half of the pleasure of
watching ´The Eye´ is the gore and especially its cinematography. In Naina,
Shripal has initial difficulties with some of the sequences after Urmila´s
sight returns. Her ´ghostly encounters´ are interesting but they get
tiresome after a while. Morakhia just wants to scare the audience or gross
them out (the autopsy scene is quite gruesome by Bollywood standards) and
it´s apparent.
The
first half of the film isn´t as fluid, some of the sequences either jar or
seem out of place. However, once we get closer to the interval Morakhia
gets a hold of the story and post interval it´s an edge of your seat ride.
Morakhia and Pandey´s screenplay is too haphazard in the first half,
however the whole back story in Gujarat (where a majority of the second
half takes place) is excellently written and will hold your interest.
While the screenplay leaves a few holes, as a final product Naina is very
entertaining especially the second time around. Cinematography by C.K.
Muraleedhauran and Jonathon Bloom is not a patch on the original but
serves its purpose here.
Muneesh Sappel´s art direction deserves mention, especially the Gujarat
sequences. Sound (Parikshit Lalwani), Visual Effects (Biju D.) and
Background score (Salim Sulaiman) all work with each other and offer a
creepy atmosphere to the film. Since Naina is a slow thriller/horror,
effects, sound and background score play a big part, and the job is well
done.
Urmila Matondkar is maturing as an artiste and is leaving her ´oomph gal´
image behind for a more serious actress image. Naina is another feather in
her cap, however it´s not her best performance. She is excellent in the
quiet scenes, however in a few (not all) of her more high tension scenes,
she borders on hamming.
This
is nothing like her understated take in ´Ek Hasina Thi´ but it´s still a
joy watching her on screen. I couldn´t envision a more effective Naina
than Urmila Matondkar (who is Bollywood´s reigning scream queen). Shweta
Konnur as Khemi turns in a very effective performance. She is one of the
highlights in the film. Amardeep Jha as her mother makes a small role
impactful. Kamini Khanna as Naina´s grandmother is way too over-the-top
and annoying. Anuj Sawhney as Naina´s doctor is passable, he doesn´t have
enough charisma or screen presence to be the hero. Rahul Nath as the
Bhooth (Ghost) is so good he´s scary in some of the scenes. Sulbha Arya is
adequate.
On
the whole Naina is worth the watch. When compared with other Bollywood
horror´s in it head and shoulders above the rest! The film offers new
scares and themes in the horror genre for Bollywood. Urmila Matondkar´s
performance is the main reason to watch the film, and first time director
Shripal Morakhia makes a great debut. With a little fine tuning he may be
a name to watch out for. A word about the climax however; it´s a little
eerie how this climax shares a lot of similarities with the July 7th
bombings in London. It´s almost enough to make you wonder if the film
would have even had a proper release if it were shifted two months back.
Luckily it made its release two months before those attacks but the
similarities are still haunting.
back to top |
|